Back to Home

Spookies

1986
5 min read
By VHS Heaven Team

Alright, gather ‘round the flickering glow of the phantom CRT, fellow tapeheads, because tonight we’re digging into a truly bizarre artifact from the dusty shelves of VHS Heaven: 1986’s Spookies. If you ever stumbled across this one back in the day, maybe lured in by that undeniably awesome, monster-packed cover art, you know you were in for… well, something. This isn't just a movie; it's practically a cinematic collision captured on magnetic tape, a glorious mess that somehow, against all odds, delivers some of the most memorable practical creature effects of the era.

### A Tale of Two Movies (Literally)

Let’s get the weirdest part out of the way first, because it explains everything. You watch Spookies and get this nagging feeling that it’s two completely different films awkwardly stitched together, right? Well, ding ding ding! You’re absolutely correct. This film has one of the most notoriously troubled productions imaginable. It started life as a more atmospheric horror film called "Twisted Souls," shot mostly in 1984 by directors Thomas Doran and Brendan Faulkner. They delivered a cut focused on a group encountering genuinely creepy monsters in an old house, summoned by an aging sorcerer.

Then came the producer disputes, the legal wrangling, the kind of behind-the-scenes chaos that seemed to plague low-budget genre fare back then. The original directors were locked out, and years later, producer Eugenie Joseph hired a different crew to shoot entirely new scenes featuring a different group of partygoers arriving at the same house, adding cheesy slasher-lite elements and trying to bridge the gaps. The result? A narrative Frankenstein, lurching between tones and plotlines with the grace of a zombie stumbling over a lawn gnome. It's baffling, disjointed, and sometimes nonsensical – and honestly, that’s part of its enduring charm.

### But Oh, Those Creatures!

Okay, so the story is a disaster salvaged from another disaster. Why bother? Two words: Practical. Effects. Forget polished CGI creations; this is the realm of latex, slime, stop-motion, and pure, unadulterated imagination brought to life by artists like Gabriel Bartalos and Arnold Gargiulo II. The original "Twisted Souls" footage is a veritable monster mash showcase. Remember the muck-men rising from the grave? The utterly terrifying spider-woman transformation? The electricity-shooting lizard demons? The Grim Reaper statue that moves?

These weren't sleek digital renders; they were tangible nightmares sculpted, puppeteered, and filmed with a raw energy that felt incredibly visceral on those old VHS tapes. The lighting might be murky, the editing sometimes choppy thanks to the splice job, but the sheer physicality of these creatures is undeniable. Watching them now, you appreciate the artistry and effort involved. This was stuff built by hand, operated by dedicated performers (sometimes the effects artists themselves!), designed to elicit a primal reaction. You can almost smell the latex fumes and Karo syrup blood through the screen. Wasn't that kind of tangible horror just something else back then?

### The Human Element (Sort Of)

Caught between the monster mayhem are the two sets of human characters. The "Twisted Souls" group feels slightly more grounded in traditional horror archetypes, trapped and reacting to the increasingly surreal threats conjured by the sorcerer Kreon (played with weary malevolence by Felix Ward). Then there’s the "Spookies" party crew, a gaggle of 80s stereotypes seemingly dropped in from a different, much goofier movie. Their dialogue often feels like placeholder text, and their main purpose seems to be wandering off to get picked off in ways that could be shoehorned around the existing monster footage.

Performances range from earnestly trying (Maria Pechukas as the sorcerer's captive wife) to… well, let's just say the focus wasn't exactly on nuanced character studies. But in a film this bizarre, the slightly stilted acting and nonsensical motivations almost add to the dreamlike (or nightmarish) quality. You're not watching for the compelling human drama; you're waiting for the next outrageous creature to pop out.

### A Cult Classic Forged in Chaos

Spookies wasn't exactly a box office smash, nor was it a critical darling upon its limited release. How could it be? It’s objectively a poorly structured film. Yet, like so many oddities from the video store era, it found its audience on home video. People rented it for the monsters, got bewildered by the plot, but couldn't forget those incredible creature moments. It became a cult favorite precisely because of its flaws and its utterly unique, chaotic energy. It’s a testament to the power of striking visuals and the strange alchemy that can happen when filmmaking goes completely off the rails.

Finding this tape felt like unearthing forbidden knowledge – a movie that shouldn't exist, yet somehow does, packed with more rubbery monster goodness per square inch than almost anything else on the shelf. It’s a film born from conflict, stitched together from disparate parts, yet somehow achieving a bizarre kind of immortality among fans of practical effects and cinematic curiosities.

Rating: 6.5 / 10

Justification: The narrative is an absolute train wreck thanks to its Frankensteinian production history, and the acting is often questionable. However, the sheer volume and creativity of the practical creature effects are genuinely outstanding for the budget and era, making it a must-see for practical effects junkies and lovers of 80s horror oddities. The rating reflects its cult status and visual inventiveness overriding its structural failings.

Final Thought: A glorious, baffling, monster-filled mess stitched together from the wreckage of another movie – Spookies is pure, unfiltered VHS-era chaos, and frankly, they just don't make 'em this weird anymore.